What Is a Good Word For This?

Can you help me? I am looking for a word — maybe a new word — to describe the transformation of an activity from (a) something done only by trained specialists, as part/all of their job to (b) something done by the general public, not as a job. For example:

  • word processing software has made producing an attractive manuscript something that you no longer need hire a secretary to do — you can do it yourself.
  • digital cameras and software have made producing high-end photographs something you no longer need a professional photographer to make.
  • When I was a graduate student I hired a professional to make publication-quality figures for my scientific papers. Now I make them myself.

The transition I am talking about is part of a longer historical sequence that goes like this:

  1. Hobby
  2. Part-time job
  3. Full-time job
  4. Specialization (= division of labor)
  5. [new word goes here]

The best word I can think of is deprofessionalization. Unfortunately that has been used with a different meaning. Amateurization doesn’t work because amateur often means hobbyist. Popularization doesn’t work because the status of the activity has changed — from something done as part of a job to something done not as a job. It is one of several ways a job can change:

  • More efficient. New tools, materials, etc., make it possible to do the same job in a shorter period of time or at lower cost.
  • Higher quality. New tools, etc., make it possible to do a better job.
  • More exclusive (= higher barriers to entry). Something (e.g., licensing requirements) makes it harder for others to compete with you.
  • Less exclusive. Something (e.g., the Internet) makes it easier for others to compete with you.
  • ???. People no longer need to hire you or someone like you to do what you do. They do it themselves.

I care because personal science (science done to help oneself) is an example. For a long time, non-trivial science was done only by professional scientists. Now it is being done by non-professionals.

More What about publicization? Or is it too ugly? I looked up democratization as a possibility but found this under “democratization of photography”:”Serious photography has gone from being the preserve of the reasonably well off to something that just about anyone can take up with minimal expense”. That isn’t what I mean here — that the price of something comes down. Hoipolloization is too long. What about massification?

Still More It really is DIY, I hadn’t thought of that. That exactly conveys the transition from job to non-job. DIYing (or should it be DIYization?) has a nice ring to it, is very short, is not pompous, and would not need to be defined. I also like promethization, deguilding, democratization, and deprofessionalization.

45 thoughts on “What Is a Good Word For This?

  1. How about “X democratization” with the domain as an adjective? Or “democratized X”?
    Democratized scientific research; democratized publishing; or demo-technologized publishing/science/photography…?
    Or demotechnic?

  2. 1. — Meme Break Out
    (like a jail break)
    2. — Idea Break Out
    (same as 1. above)
    3. — De-Walling
    (like taking down the Berlin Wall)
    4. — De-Latinization
    (like when the Catholic Church in the 1960s moved away from the Latin Mass)
    5. — Epidigm or Epidigmia, or Epidigmic
    (When a paradigm breaks out and spreads rapidly, like an epidemic)

  3. Democratisation is used to mean this in French, among other things – ‘accessibility’ is also used in British English. I heard a great soundbite way of expressing this by an open source software guru “zero to expert in zero dollars”.

  4. Deguilding? As in the science is no longer held by a guild. Maybe there’s a better word around ‘guild’.
    Commodification or Commoditization? It implies the limited nature of expertise has been let loose for the masses. A pain to spell.
    Defrocked? Religious, but more personal.

  5. Deprofessionalization is still your best choice. Just commandeer it. “Photography has become deprofessionalized.” Sounds just right. Who cares if it has another meaning too? However, muggleficaction (adapting a term from Harry Potter) would mean it’s not being done exclusively by the wizards anymore. Too cute for my taste, though.

  6. Massification sounds good.
    For example, in programming, available to virtually anyone with a computer, there is a strong tendency for hobbyist projects to grow into worldwide-accepted tools. Gmail started as a side-project, as several website-building frameworks. I’d call that massification without a doubt (:

  7. Personal science is more like practicing a religion without going to church; without the blessings of the ordained leaders of the religion. It is today considered blasphemous to examine one’s own reactions to change, even if most confounding variables can be eliminated.

  8. Personal science is more like practicing a religion without going to church; without the blessings of the ordained leaders of the religion.

    yes, that’s very true. It does have a “how dare you!” (blasphemous) aspect, which other instances of deprofessionalization or whatever you call it — such as digital photography — do not.
    To answer your question, all the examples I can think of came from new cheap technology.

  9. I like ‘demotic’ better than ‘democratic’ since it’s shorter and avoids political associations. Poor basis for a noun, though, and obscure.
    Self-help is to the point too, but has a more specialized meaning now.

  10. How about self-reliafication?
    Aren’t we talking about being less reliant on others so we can be more self-sufficient? “Self-sufficientication” seems a little too much for one word. -:)

  11. Laity (and related terms as lay workers, laymen, laypersons, etc ) is widely used and understood in most Catholic and Protestant congregations. I think it is much more widely used and understood than you might imagine or have experienced. I think “laificiation” is a good fit. Some congregations have lay pastors or lay preachers – exactly the transition from specialist (priest or preacher) to “something done by the general public, not as a job.” that you are looking for.

  12. My contribution is “vernacularization”.
    But I actually agree with Carl Willat. Just commandeer “deprofessionalization”.
    Linguistic patterns like “de + X + ization” don’t typically have precise meanings out of context, but people coin new instances because they need a term for some precise meaning. So, the established meaning of “deprofessionalization” (= a shift in a job’s requirements from a high to lower skill level [?]) occupies only one point in the field of potential meanings of that word. There is room for alternative meanings.

  13. I think that this process is simply the march of technology, and the growth of wealth in society. Over time, the total amount of valuable things grows, and stuff that was only available to royalty and billionaires eventually becomes ubiquitous.
    Examples include automobiles (85% of households below poverty line have one, 35% have two cars), cell phones, computers, spices (black pepper was worth more than gold at one time), indoor plumbing, medicine (most common drugs are now $4 per bottle at Walmart), electronics (DVD players, navigation systems), etc.
    As time passes, we find ways to make everything cheaper, and everyone can afford to do what specialists used to charge a premium for, basically because they had access to expensive equipment that regular people could not afford.
    I think personal science is a different phenomenon. It’s an act of dissension, taking matters into one’s own hands instead of asking high-ranking men of science for approval, who have convinced most of us that large double-blind studies are the only way to differentiate causation from correlation. Most people are convinced that anecdotal evidence is worthless, and that the only way to know if a drug or treatment will work is to look to the leaders of the scientific community, in the same way that religious leaders in the middle ages convinced most that they were the only way to decide was is moral and what is not, and the only way to predict the future. In the past, they predicted armageddon; today they predict runaway man-made global warming that will kill us all. It’s basically the same religious process.
    So, in the future, I suspect that more and more of us will realize the nature of scientific religion, as it were, and begin to defect from its grip in ever greater numbers. Today huge percentages of Europeans are agnostic about God, and I suspect that many years from now most of the developed world will be pro-personal-science, and will largely discount the influence of the scientific-religious leaders of tomorrow. Many years from now we will realize that science is today controlling the lives of average people in the same way as medieval priests.

  14. When something that was done by everybody becomes the domain of professionals, it’s called “professionalization” – and the opposite would be “de-professionalization.” This is similar to, for example, deschooling as Illich used it, which I like in this context. And similar to de-medicalization of breastfeeding which needs to happen, and de-professionalization of breastfeeding consultants back to LLL ideals.

  15. I really like Christopher Burd’s suggestion of “vernacularization”.
    I also like the idea of a public skill set that changes and has things enter (and exit, say weaving or sewing) this way. Having language to talk about the public skill set would be useful because I most often see people talking about how we have fewer public skills, when it seems that they just change over time and changing based on technology available is normal flow (eg high literacy)

  16. “Vernacularization” is also a good Ivan Illich word. DIYization does what Seth want, but makes linguistic purists grit our teeth.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *