Assorted Links

Thanks to Alex Blackwood and Bryan Castañeda.

5 thoughts on “Assorted Links

  1. Here’s another article that I found to be interesting:

    A very modern trauma

    It’s a blog post about some new studies about post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The studies suggest that this is a modern disease (soldiers from the American Civil War didn’t seem to get it, for example).

  2. Seth, can’t imagine how you found my little blog. Sorry if you took any diss from it. You must admit your diet sounds like a (genius) hoax from a standing start!

    But the combination of actually feeling it working and reading your clear explanations and justifications of the theory have brought me round as far as ‘A good idea, not proven’.

    I’d seriously like it to be true though. Not just for me (I’m usually slightly overweight) but for all the poor fat people in the world who are made extra miserable by idiots telling them it’s their fault.

    The weak spot in the theory to me looks like ‘set point adjusting to lack of flavours’. I can’t imagine why it would work that way.

    I can imagine some poor caveman starving to death because last Tuesday he couldn’t finish his plate of mammoth and now it’s gone off! Surely he’d be well advised to eat everything he can get his hands on in mid-winter.

    Evolution does seem to come up with some spectacularly crap mechanisms, but control of appetite must be very ancient, and you’d think it properly debugged by now.

    Also, I get the impression that your diet just doesn’t work for some people, so there must be some pieces of the puzzle still to put in, even if the theory’s basically right.

    Why the hell has there not been any large-scale independent controlled experiment on this? The effect seems obvious, large, testable and Nobel-prize worthy.

    Seth: “The weak spot in the theory to me looks like ‘set point adjusting to lack of flavours’. I can’t imagine why it would work that way”. My explanation: The weight control system uses the strength of smell-calorie associations to judge the abundance of food. When food is abundant, we eat food that tastes better (= stronger smell-calorie association) than when food is scarce. Zero smell-calorie association is treated as close to weak smell-calorie association. When food is scarce is when your set point should go down, just as when you are unemployed is when you should spend money in your bank account.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *