In an excellent Authors@Google talk based on his book The Birth of Plenty — about the increase in GDP growth that started around the Industrial Revolution — William Bernstein mentions what he calls “The Resource Curse”:
If all your wealth comes out of a couple of holes in the ground, the quickest way to become wealthy . . . is control of those holes and access to those holes. It breeds corruption, and it breeds poor government, and it drains the entrepreneurial spirit. The best way to get rich is to have no natural resources at all. Think Singapore, think Japan.
Could the same be true of science? Could access to resources — say, a lot of grant money or expensive equipment — breed corruption and poor government, and drain the entrepreneurial spirit? It isn’t obvious why not. Surely human nature is essentially the same in both places. This may have something to do with Gary Taubes’ complaints about poor nutritional science in Good Calories, Bad Calories.
I rarely mention in this blog my animal learning research, which in recent years has been about exactly this — with animals (rats and pigeons). The results of our experiments are easy to sum up: When animals have access to rich sources of food, it drains the entrepreneurial spirit. In psychology-speak, when the probability of reward for actions is high, there is less variation in what animals do than when the probability of reward is low. I got into this line of research by accident.
