My Omega-3 Talk at Psychonomics

At the November meeting of the Psychonomic Society, a group of experimental psychologists, I gave a 15-minute talk (PowerPoint) about my omega-3 research. (Anyone know how to add audio to a PowerPoint file?) Almost all the data in the talk I’ve posted here, but it had one not-blogged idea, which I summarize like this:

optimize brain –> optimize body

The intake level of a nutrient that optimizes brain function should be close to the level that optimizes the function of everything else. In particular, the omega-3 intake that makes the brain work best should be close to the level that makes the rest of the body work best. This is because the brain and the rest of the body are bathed in the same blood.

It is easy to see why this is so. I have many electrical appliances: clock, telephone, TV, microwave, refrigerator, laser printer. In spite of vastly different innards and functions, all of them run best when their electrical supply is very close to house current. The electric current that makes my laser printer work best is very close to the electric current that makes my refrigerator work best. Of course, this is by design. LIkewise, the different parts of our body, although doing vastly different things, have all been adjusted by evolution to work best with the nutritional equivalent of house current. Just as we might study laser printers to learn what current to use with our refrigerator, we can study the brain to learn what nutrients optimize immune function.

This is a new idea in nutrition (at least, new to me). It is supported by and explains some of the most interesting data I’ve posted. It explains why Tyler Cowen’s gums got so much better so quickly — because he was taking almost exactly the best amount of flaxseed oil for his gums. Tyler chose his intake of flaxseed oil based on my behavioral data, which suggested the best amount was between 2 and 3 tablespoons/day. The gums and the brain could hardly be more different, but the best level for the brain turned out to do a wonderful job of healing his gums. Same thing with Anonymous and sports injuries.

By the way, this shows the scientific value of blogging. My gums got better, too, but not as impressively as Tyler’s. I didn’t have a lot of injuries to heal. The big improvements noticed by Tyler and Anonymous were “accidents” (unintended consequences). Science thrives on accidents; blogging, it turns out, is a new way to generate them.

Ulcerative Colitis and Flaxseed Oil

Ulcerative colitis is a disease of too much inflammation. The Mayo Clinic recommends several dangerous and expensive anti-inflammatory drugs. Based on its effect on inflamed gums (gingivitis), I suspect flaxseed oil would be very effective, much safer, more convenient, and much cheaper, assuming you get the right dose (about 2 tablespoons/day).

Flaxseed oil is not on the Mayo Clinic list. Nor is any other source of omega-3. In a store today I ran into a woman seeking herbal treatments for ulcerative colitis. She hadn’t heard of using flaxseed oil.

Does anyone reading this have direct experience about what happens when you take flaxseed oil for ulcerative colitis?

The Mayo Clinic website doesn’t say anything about using flaxseed oil (or other omega-3 sources) to treat gingivitis. (And the Mayo Clinic claims expertise on alternative medicine.) Nor does it say gingivitis is caused by too much inflammation. In two weeks, you can see for yourself they are wrong.

Omega-3 and Depression

From the abstract of a 2003 article titled “A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Omega-3 Fatty Acid Docosahexaenoic Acid in the Treatment of Major Depression”:

Thirty-six depressed patients were randomly assigned to receive DHA, 2 g/day, or placebo for 6 weeks. Response was defined a priori as a >=50% reduction in the score on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale. Thirty-five participants were evaluable; 18 received DHA, and 17 received placebo. RESULTS: Response rates were 27.8% in the DHA group and 23.5% in the placebo group. The difference in response rates between groups did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: This trial failed to show a significant effect of DHA monotherapy in subjects with major depression.

This study is unusual in that it used DHA rather than EPA. EPA studies have been more successful. Excerpt from an overview:

One meta-analysis combined all the studies involving adults with unipolar or bipolar depression reported above, in which omega-3 fatty acids were used to augment existing treatments or as monotherapy. Best-case and worst-case analyses were carried out, and omega-3 fatty acids were found to produce a statistical improvement compared to placebo under both scenarios (best-case p = 0.02, worst-case p = 0.03). A second review including the same data has also suggested a benefit of omega-3 fatty acids in major depression. However, as the authors of both reviews point out, there is significant heterogeneity among the included trials, and this undermines the reliability of the combined results.

Here is the conclusion from another review article:

Trial evidence that examines the effects of n–3 PUFAs on depressed mood is limited and is difficult to summarize and evaluate because of considerable heterogeneity. The evidence available provides little support for the use of n–3 PUFAs to improve depressed mood.

A weak effect, in other words. I would be surprised if omega-3s helped a lot with depression. My self-experimentation pointed to a different cause of depression — seeing faces too little in the morning and/or too much at night.

Eskimos, Heart Disease, and Omega-3s: The Plot Thickens

David Marcus made the following comment on an earlier post:

It’s a myth that Eskimos have low rates of heart disease. Actually, recent studies have shown they have high rates of cardiovascular disease (50% higher than western populations) despite diets that are very high in fatty fish.

Mr. Marcus makes a very good point (and it is wonderful to get such informative feedback). Myth is wrong. A Greenland doctor’s casual observation — Eskimos almost never died of heart attacks — was confirmed by a detailed study, published in Acta Medica Scandinavica in 1980. A r ecent study, however, found this:

OBJECTIVES: The thirty-year-old hypothesis that omega-3 fatty acid (FA) may “reduce the development of thrombosis and atherosclerosis in the Western World” still needs to be tested. Dyerberg-Bang based their supposition on casual observations that coronary atherosclerosis in Greenlandic Inuit was ‘almost unknown’ and that they consumed large amounts of omega-3 FAs. However, no association was demonstrated with data. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: 454 Alaskan Eskimos were screened for coronary heart disease (CHD), using a protocol that included ECG, medical history, Rose questionnaire, blood chemistries, including plasma FA concentrations, and a 24-hour recall and a food frequency questionnaire assessment of omega-3 FA consumption. RESULTS: CHD was found in 6% of the cohort under 55 years of age and in 26% of those > or = 55 years of age. Eskimos with CHD consume as much omega-3 FAs as those without CHD, and the plasma concentrations confirm that dietary assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Average daily consumption of omega-3 FAs among Eskimos was high, with about 3-4 g/d reported, compared with 1-2 g/d used in intervention studies and the average consumption of 0.2 g/d by the American population. There was no association between current omega-3 FA consumption/blood concentrations and the presence of CHD.

A well-written abstract, by the way.

Science is like a game of telephone. It would be truly weird if the initial observation was wrong, given that it was later confirmed in detail and productively followed up — and no one doubts that omega-3 increases clotting time. But “replications” are never exact. This study, for example, measured “in vivo” CHD, whereas the initial observation was about causes of death. The group of Eskimos studied is probably different; and their lifestyle, especially their diet, may have changed substantially in the last 30 years. On the other hand, these new observations are consistent with the great difficulty there has been in confirming the idea that omega-3 fats reduce heart disease.

Interview with a Discoverer of the Importance of Omega-3

Dr. Jorn Dyerberg was one of two Danish doctors who discovered that Eskimos in Greenland, with low rates of heart disease, have much more omega-3 in their blood than Danes in Greenland, with normal rates of heart disease. This was the beginning of the great interest in omega-3s. Here is an interview with Dr. Dyberg. Among his comments:

As for ALA, an omega-3 from plants that is converted in the body to EPA and subsequently DHA, he was unconvinced. In terms of biological effects of DHA and EPA, Dr. Dyerberg said there are many. “We don’t know of any specific biological effects of ALA,” he said.

“Tissue experiments give you an ALA concentration of zero. This omega-3 is either burnt or converted,” he said. “And the conversion is low.”

“If we want the benefits of omega-3, we have to eat them as long chain,” he said, referring to EPA and DHA.

My research — revealing very clear benefits of flaxseed oil, no doubt because of its ALA — shows this is quite wrong.

Thanks to Dave Lull.

Omega-3 and Blood Pressure

I was surprised to see a chapter in Fish, Omega-3 and Human Health devoted to hypertension. Isn’t high blood pressure caused by too much salt and too much weight? Well, yes, but a special strain of rats used as an animal model of hypertension turned out to have a defect in their immune system. Perhaps high blood pressure is also caused by immune-system over-reaction.

A 1993 meta-analysis of studies of the effect of fish oil on blood pressure concluded:

Diet supplementation with a relatively high dose of omega-3 PUFA, generally more than 3 g/d, can lead to clinically relevant BP reductions in individuals with untreated hypertension.

The sizes of the blood pressure changes:

Weighted, pooled estimates of SBP [systolic blood pressure] and DBP [diastolic blood pressure] change (mm Hg) with 95% confidence intervals were -1.0 (-2.0 to 0.0) and -0.5 (-1.2 to +0.2) in the trials of normotensives, and -5.5 (-8.1 to -2.9) and -3.5 (-5.0 to -2.1) in the trials of untreated hypertensives.

A different meta-analysis reached essentially the same conclusion.

Note the use of fish oil. Fish oil has long-chain omega-3 fats, while flaxseed oil — which I have used in my self-experimentation — has only the short-chain omega-3 fat, which is converted to long-chain omega-3 after you eat it. Fish oil is often considered better because the omega-3s don’t need to be converted. But this way of thinking misses something. Because the omega-3s in flaxseed oil are converted to long-chain omega-3s by enzymes, the amount of long-chain omega-3 in the body rises more slowly (and thus lasts longer) than if you take fish oil supplying the same amount of long-chain omega-3. Flaxseed oil supplies a kind of time-release long-chain omega-3. A long low dose could easily be more potent than a short high dose.

Thanks to Dave Lull.

Omega-3 and Sports Injuries (more)

Anonymous found, to his surprise, that his martial-arts injuries healed faster after he started taking flaxseed oil (2 T/day). A comment about Popeye vitamins led him to stop taking flaxseed oil. Within ten days, his gums got worse, and his sports injuries became more painful. He has written again:

After going off flaxseed oil for about ten days and seeing all sorts of negative side effects, I have now been back on it for about ten days (this time with four tablespoons a day instead of two), and I am totally back to where I was before I stopped. Gums aren’t bleeding at all, joints and tendons don’t ache, and I feel great. Anecdotal evidence yes, but very persuasive to me. I have kept taking four tablespoons instead of the previously normal two because I think it increases my mental acuity

Very persuasive to me, too, regardless of what it is called.

Fish, Omega-3 and Human Health

I ordered Fish, Omega-3 and Human Health (2005, 2nd ed.) by William Lands from Amazon in March. It came a few days ago. It is published by the AOCS Press. AOCS = American Oil Chemists’ Society.

A jewel of a book. Like a research monograph, it has lots of data, graphs, and references; unlike a research monograph, it tries to reach any scientifically literate reader, not just specialists. It has much more about mechanism than other books on the subject. “Health” in the title mainly means circulatory system health (heart disease, strokes); there is also a chapter on the immune system and a chapter on cancer. Almost nothing about mental illness or the brain. Nothing about gum disease.

I read the first edition a year ago. It is a sign of changes in my thinking that I didn’t notice a comparison of epilepsy rates in Eskimos (high omega-3 diet) and Danes (low omega-3 diet) living in Greenland. The Eskimos have twice as much epilepsy. It is the only big negative effect of the Eskimo diet. The epilepsy difference fits something I think now but didn’t think a year ago: omega-3 makes neurons more easily excited. Three observations led me to this: (a) In my choice reaction-time experiments, flaxseed oil caused an increase in anticipation errors. To reduce them, I changed from a two-choice task to a four-choice task. (b) A friend said I have become more talkative, apparently due to consuming much more flaxseed oil/day. (c) I found that flaxseed oil reduces simple RT — latency to press a button when something happens.

The two-to-one epilepsy ratio is the only case where the Eskimos are clearly worse off. The ratios in the other direction are much larger. The Danes had 20 times more psoriasis than the Eskimos (as I noted earlier), and 25 times more bronchial asthma.

At Thanksgiving Dinner…

…My sister said that — curious from reading this blog — she increased her daily dose of flaxseed oil from one capsule (10 calories) to 1 Tablespoon (110 calories) per day. She noticed three positive effects. One is that the skin around her fingernails improved. It cracked less often. (I’d say the same — hadn’t realized it until she mentioned it.) Another, first noticed by her dentist (”I didn’t say anything”), is that her gums were in better shape. The third, more subtle than the first two, is more energy. She has noticed no negative effects.

Omega-3: What Happens When You Stop?

Anonymous wrote again, with new data:

I started taking two tablespoons of flax seed oil about a month after reading this post by you [about Tyler Cowen’s dental experience] (sometime around the beginning of August, I think). I decided to try it because I have had bleeding gums for about as long as I can remember. This has always confused me, because I don’t have any cavities and have otherwise good dental health. I would always ask my dentists about this, and they would always tell me I didn’t floss enough, but even when I would floss regularly, the bleeding wouldn’t totally stop. After about a week or so of two tablespoons of flax seed oil a day, I had virtually no gum bleeding. I didn’t change anything else.

Then, about two weeks ago, my girlfriend pointed something out to me: I was not taking pain relievers anymore. I train in amateur mixed martial arts (MMA), which is a very intense, full contact combat sport that combines boxing, muay thai, brazilian jiu-jitsu, and wrestling. For as long as I’ve been training in it, I have had to deal with muscle soreness and pain in my joints, and to deal with it, I would take 4-6 ibuprofen before training. But, for about the past three months, I wasn’t in enough pain to need it. I didn’t really think about it at first, just chalking it up to getting tougher. But that doesn’t make sense–I’ve been training in MMA for well over a year, and the only thing I have done differently in the past three months is start taking flax seed oil. I wasn’t 100% sure that the flax seed oil was making the difference, but considering the effect it has on inflammation–which is what ibuprofen is for–it made sense.

That was when I sent you the emails you posted. One of your commenters accused me of falling victim to the placebo effect, so I decided to test it. I stopped taking flaxseed oil on November 5th. At the time, my gums were not bleeding, I had no joint pain or soreness of any significance, and I felt great overall.

As I write this it’s November 15th. My gums have bled heavily when I brushed this week, especially the past few days, and I have intense pain in both shoulders, soreness in my left elbow, and my knees are throbbing. I had intended to go two weeks without taking any flaxseed oil, but I am stopping the experiment now because this is all the proof I need.

One more interesting fact: I took four tablespoons a few hours ago, instead of the regular two, thinking that maybe I could load up and it might help me get back to normal quickly. The pain is pretty much the same, and I just brushed and my gums bled, so obviously the flaxseed oil takes more than a few hours to affect those problems. But–and I haven’t measured this with reaction tests like you do–I feel considerably more mentally alert right now. I don’t know if I felt like this before, and maybe I didn’t notice it because it came on slowly, or maybe I need four tablespoons at once to see a difference, but I really do feel the difference.